The Society of Surgical Oncology, inc.
The American Society of Breast Surgeons.
Annals of Surgical Oncology

Log in | Register

Verification of Musculoskeletal FDG-PET-CT Findings Performed for Melanoma Staging

Alfred A. Mansour III MD, Mark C. Kelley MD, Allison R. Hatmaker MD, Ginger E. Holt MD, Herbert S. Schwartz MD
Melanomas
Volume 17, Issue 4 / April , 2009

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to establish the validity of F-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) scan staging for cutaneous melanoma when a musculoskeletal image abnormality is detected.

Methods

An institutional review board (IRB)-approved prospective database was queried to identify 342 melanoma patients treated between 4/1999 and 12/2007. A total of 682 whole-body FDG-PET-CT scans performed for staging were retrospectively reviewed to identify FDG-avid lesions in the deep soft tissues/muscle, bone or joints (i.e., musculoskeletal sites). Images were correlated with follow-up patient records.

Results

There were 187 true-positive sites on 94 scans and 26 false-positive sites on 22 scans. The overall false-positive rate was 13.9% (26/187). The positive predictive value (PPV) of an isolated musculoskeletal FDG-avid site was 31%. The PPV was highest (100%) when findings were present in both the bone and deep soft tissues. The relative risk of an isolated FDG-avid site compared with multiple FDG-avid sites not being melanoma was 5.33 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.85–9.94]. The relative risk of an FDG-avid site seen in the appendicular region not being melanoma was 1.78 (95% CI 0.87–3.64) that of a site seen in the axial region.

Conclusions

FDG-PET-CT scanning for staging and surveillance in the extremities of patients with high-risk melanoma often creates confusing clinical scenarios. Our data suggest that a select subset of patients with isolated avid appendicular musculoskeletal scan may not have metastatic melanoma.

Add a comment



0 comment(s)

Special Announcement:             ASO IMPACT FACTOR RISES

The 2010 Impact Factor for Annals of Surgical Oncology has risen to 4.182, the third consecutive annual increase in the journal's impact ranking. The journal is now ranked 8 of 187 journals publishing in Thomson Reuters' (formerly ISI) subject category "Surgery," making it the top ranked oncology journal in surgery. The number of journal citations rose from 8,085 in 2008 to 11,090.

 

HIGHLIGHTED VIDEO OF THE MONTH

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Colonic Mesentery by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by R. A. Cahill MD, FRCS, S. Perretta MD, J. Leroy MD, B. Dallemagne MD, and J. Marescaux MD, FRCS, FACS.  Annals of Surgical Oncology. Volume 15, Number 10, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9952-8