Log in | Register
Bernard T. Lee MD, FACS, Chen Chen MS, Janet H. Yueh MD, Minh-Doan Nguyen MD, PhD, Samuel J. Lin MD, Adam M. Tobias MD Reconstructive Oncology Volume 17, Issue 3 / March , 2009
View full article HTML | View full article PDF | Download Citation
Shared decision making (SDM) combines evidence-based medicine with individual patient preferences. Patients who are actively engaged in their own health care management with their physicians have been shown to experience not only increased compliance, but also higher satisfaction and better outcomes. We hypothesize that a computer-based learning module for breast reconstruction increases patient involvement in the decision-making process.
Women who underwent either immediate or delayed breast reconstruction at an academic teaching hospital from 2004 to 2007 were identified. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were mailed questionnaires on demographics, informational resources, and decision-making processes. Questionnaire results were divided into 2 groups for analysis: patients who received a standard surgeon consultation and patients who were shown a computer-based decision aid in addition to the standard consultation.
There were 358 women eligible for our study. A total of 255 patients (75.9%) responded to the survey; 168 patients were shown the computer-based decision aid and 87 patients were not. Patients who used the computer-based learning module reported a greater role in choosing the type of reconstruction (P < .001). Additionally, these patients reported a greater number of reconstructive options offered to them (P < .001) and were more satisfied with the amount of information provided by their reconstructive surgeon (P = .049).
A computer-based learning module allows patients to assimilate information and actively participate in choosing type of breast reconstruction. Use of this educational modality represents a simple and effective way to improve the shared decision-making process.
Go to Issue Contents
Add this article to your Personal Archive
The 2010 Impact Factor for Annals of Surgical Oncology has risen to 4.182, the third consecutive annual increase in the journal's impact ranking. The journal is now ranked 8 of 187 journals publishing in Thomson Reuters' (formerly ISI) subject category "Surgery," making it the top ranked oncology journal in surgery. The number of journal citations rose from 8,085 in 2008 to 11,090.
HIGHLIGHTED VIDEO OF THE MONTH
Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Colonic Mesentery by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by R. A. Cahill MD, FRCS, S. Perretta MD, J. Leroy MD, B. Dallemagne MD, and J. Marescaux MD, FRCS, FACS. Annals of Surgical Oncology. Volume 15, Number 10, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9952-8