Log in |
Juliette Christie PhD, Gwendolyn P. Quinn PhD, Teri Malo PhD, Ji-Hyun Lee PhD, Xiuhua Zhao MPH, Jessica McIntyre BA, Jennifer Brzosowicz MS, CGC, Paul B. Jacobsen PhD, Susan T. Vadaparampil PhD
Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
View full article HTML | View full article PDF | Download Citation
To examine changes in cancer-related knowledge, distress, and decisional conflict from pre- to post-genetic counseling (GC) in before (BDS) and after (ADS) definitive surgery breast cancer (BC) patients.
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline; primary outcome data were collected before (T1) and after (T2) pretest GC. Within group changes for cancer-related knowledge, distress, and decisional conflict over genetic testing were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Of 103 BC patients, 87 were ADS and 16 were BDS. Analyses revealed that both groups reported significant increases in knowledge between T1 and T2 (median change 4.2, p = 0.004, and 2.7, p < 0.001, for BDS and ADS patients, respectively). Overall cancer-related distress showed a downward trend between T1 and T2 for both groups and was significant for BDS patients (p = 0.041). Reports of BDS patients trended toward overall and subscale-specific increases in decisional conflict, with the exception of the uncertainty which trended downward, but did not reach significance. Overall decisional conflict decreased in ADS patients, approaching marginal significance (p = 0.056), with significant improvements in informed decision making (median change −12.6, p < 0.001; i.e., pretest GC yielded improved knowledge of benefits, risks, and side effects of available options).
These pilot data suggest that pretest GC increases cancer-related knowledge for both BDS and ADS patients, decreases distress in BDS patients, and improves informed decision making in ADS patients. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to replicate these results.
Go to Issue Contents
Add this article to your Personal Archive
Follow the journal on Twitter and help to expand the reach of the journal to help surgical oncologists and their patients.
MANUSCRIPT PROCESSING FEE
Effective January 2013, a manuscript processing fee of $50 USD is required for each initial new submission of an Annals article, excluding editorials. Submitted new manuscripts will not enter the review process until the submission fee has been paid. There is no processing fee associated with resubmitted manuscripts.
HIGHLIGHTED VIDEO OF THE MONTH
Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Colonic Mesentery by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) by R. A. Cahill MD, FRCS, S. Perretta MD, J. Leroy MD, B. Dallemagne MD, and J. Marescaux MD, FRCS, FACS. Annals of Surgical Oncology. Volume 15, Number 10, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9952-8
Annals of Surgical Oncology is copyrighted by the Society of Surgical Oncology
© Springer Healthcare Ltd. A part of Springer Science+Business Media