The Society of Surgical Oncology, inc.
The American Society of Breast Surgeons.
Annals of Surgical Oncology

Log in | Register

National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC): A Robust Quality Tool : Breast Center Quality Measures

C. S. Kaufman MD, FACS, L. Shockney RN, BS, MAS, CBPN-C, B. Rabinowitz PhD, MSW, RN, C. Coleman RN, OCN, C. Beard, J. Landercasper MD, FACS, J. B. Askew Jr. MD, D. Wiggins
Breast Oncology
Volume 17, Issue 2 / February , 2009

Abstract

Introduction

Measuring and improving quality of care is of primary interest to patients, clinicians, and payers. The National Consortium of Breast Centers (NCBC) has created a unique program to assess and compare the quality of interdisciplinary breast care provided by breast centers across the country.

Methods

In 2005 the NCBC Quality Initiative Committee formulated their initial series of 37 measurements of breast center quality, eventually called the National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC). Measures were derived from published literature as well as expert opinion. An interactive website was created to enter measurement data from individual breast centers and to provide customized comparison reports. Breast centers submit information using data they collect over a single month on consecutive patients. Centers can compare their results with centers of similar size and demographic or compare themselves to all centers who supplied answers for individual measures. New data may be submitted twice yearly. Serially submitted data allow centers to compare themselves over time. NQMBC random audits confirm accuracy of submitted data. Early results on several initial measures are reported here.

Results

Over 200 centers are currently submitting data to the NQMBC via the Internet without charge. These measures provide insight regarding timeliness of care provided by radiologists, surgeons, and pathologists. Results are expressed as the mean average, as well as 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for each metric. This sample of seven measures includes data from over 30,000 patients since 2005, representing a powerful database. In addition, comparison results are available every 6 months, recognizing that benchmarks may change over time.

Conclusions

A real-time web-based quality improvement program facilitates breast center input, providing immediate comparisons with other centers and results serially over time. Data may be used by centers to recognize high-quality care they provide or to identify areas for quality improvement. Initial results demonstrate the power and potential of web-based tools for data collection and analysis from hundreds of centers who care for thousands of patients.

Add a comment



0 comment(s)

Special Announcement:             NEW IMPACT FACTOR OF 4.130

The 2009 Impact Factor for Annals of Surgical Oncology has risen to 4.130. The journal is now ranked 6 of 166 journals publishing in Thomson Reuters' (formerly ISI) subject category "Surgery," making it the top ranked oncology journal in surgery.

 

HIGHLIGHTED VIDEO OF THE MONTH

Liver Resection with Portal Vein Thrombectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Vascular Invasion

Luca Aldrighetti MD, Carlo Pulitanò MD, Marco Catena MD, Marcella Arru MD, Eleonora Guzzetti MD, Jane Halliday MD, Gianfranco Ferla MD